Wade Laszlo for PERA Board

 

I am running for the Public Employees Retirement Association Board (PERA).

Ballots will be arriving at your home January 2-10, 2023.

If elected I will represent the Retirees, Disabled and Survivor beneficiaries of the PERA pension with all of the passion I have given to the members in my previous stewardship's.

I would greatly appreciate your vote.

Experience:

Detention Deputy, Hennepin County Sheriff's Office,  Hennepin County Jail 1990 to 2016.

Union Steward Teamsters Local 320 mid 1990's - 2011.

Elected as a National Delegate to the 2011 International Brotherhood of Teamsters Convention.

Union Steward Minnesota Public Employees Association (MNPEA) 2011-2015.

Served as an advisor to the Minnesota Senate's Telecommunicators Pension Benefits Working Group  2021.

President Minnesota Correctional Officer Retirement Association MNCORA  

Over the years I have negotiated numerous Labor Contracts with Hennepin County.

I have represented members in grievances both contractual and disciplinary.

I attend the PERA meetings and stay on top of our issues.

 

I will support strong investment returns to keep the plans well funded and achieve maximum COLA's.

I would greatly appreciate your vote and will work hard for you.

Wade Laszlo

 

Running for the PERA Board!

I submitted the paperwork to be on the Ballot of the PERA Board (Public Employees Retirement Association) earlier this month. 

I am running for the Retired, Disabled and Survivor representative seat.

If elected I would be the first (to my knowledge) retired corrections officer to serve on the PERA Board.

Experience:

Detention Deputy, Hennepin County Sheriff's Office,  Hennepin County Jail 1990 to 2016.

Union Steward Teamsters Local 320 mid 1990's - 2011.

Elected as a National Delegate to the 2011 International Brotherhood of Teamsters Convention.

Union Steward Minnesota Public Employees Association (MNPEA) 2011-2015.

Served as an advisor to the Minnesota Senate's Telecommunicators Pension Benefits Working Group  2021.

President Minnesota Correctional Officer Retirement Association MNCORA  

Over the years I have negotiated numerous Labor Contracts with Hennepin County.

I have represented members in grievances both contractual and disciplinary.

I attend the PERA meetings and stay on top of our issues.

If elected I will represent the Retirees, Disabled and Survivor beneficiaries of the PERA pension with all of the passion I have to the members in my previous stewardship's.

I will support strong investment returns to keep the plans well funded and achieve maximum COLA's.

Thank you to all of you who signed the nomination form. Here's the timeline of  event's leading to the election. The next step is to vote! 

Vote Wade Laszlo, PERA Board!

Election Timeline:

911 Telecommunicators Working Group Update

If you've been following along you know there's a 911 Telecommunicators Working group going on at the State Level.

I applied to be the member representing the PERA Correctional plan, but another person was chosen by PERA.

I then contacted the Executive Director of the LPCR (Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement) in the hopes of being added by them. They did not add me to the Workgroup but they agreed to put me on as an advisor. I can make our concerns known as a  PERA Correctional Plan Member and Retiree and be a resource for the Committee.

The First meeting is Friday July 30, I will attend and update all of you.

Many of you are already members of our E-Tree open to PERA Correctional Plan members and Retirees and can read more in depth what's happening there.

If you are not email pera.watchdog@gmail.com  Type ADD ME in the subject line. Include who you are and where you work or retired from. 

Watch this site for a big announcement either this Friday or Monday.

PERA Board Meeting and Bill SF2198 update

 I attended the April 8th PERA Board meeting via zoom. 

The subject of the Legislature adding 911 Dispatchers to our Correctional Pension was addressed, Senate Bill SF2198.

Here's the position adopted by the PERA Board.

Essentially, if the Legislators decide to add a group to our pension PERA is recommending they do one of two things.

One, an added group would start out as new to our pension and at contributions sufficient to fully fund the higher benefit.

Or

Two, the City or County of that group would have to pay an amount into our pension sufficient to fully fund that individual and not harm our actuarial value. So if a 55 year old dispatcher who worked for a county for 30 years was put into our pension, that county would have to add 30 years of contributions into our Correctional Plan. This would be extremely expensive for cities and counties budgets.

I had a very productive phone conversation with PERA Executive Director Doug Anderson today. We both want to keep our pension healthy as it is the best funded of all the PERA pensions. 

PERA has no say as to who is in the Pension, the Legislature does, so keep on your State Senators and Representatives, but PERA very much has a say in the how much this change would cost our plan.

So far no companion House File has been added to this Bill. It can't happen without that. I hope it stays that way.

Our Pension was founded on inmate contact and the high risk associated with that. We need to guard this!

PERA Correctional Pension alert, SF 2198

 There's a bill in the Minnesota Senate that poses a danger to the PERA Correctional Pension.

Our pension is the healthiest and best funded of all of the PERA Pensions. This was by design. When formed in 1999 it was for Correctional/Detention Officers who had 95% inmate contact. It recognized the danger and hazards of the job. Just this week a CO was killed in Iowa and another held hostage in Oklahoma. Numerous Detention Deputies and CO's have contracted Covid 19 due to close proximity to inmates and brought it home to their families. Unfortunately this goes with the territory and for that reason the PERA Correctional Plan provides a 55 out. I left 5 years ago at 57 because as I used to say, "I don't want to be 60 years old and wrestling with a 20 year old in the sallyport."

Enter SF 2198. It seeks to add 911 Telecommunicators to our pension. 

It reads, "911 telecommunicators transfer from the general employees retirement plan to the local government correctional plan; transferring eligible service credit."

There is more to this than it appears. First off, they don't have inmate contact and the same dangers CO's have. Secondly, when our plan formed in 1999 we were not allowed to transfer our service credit from the PERA General Pension to the new Correctional one. Any funds we left in the General Plan we had to withdraw losing the employer portion, or couldn't touch until 65. The same goes for Licensed Deputies and LEO's who went from being a CO to Licensed. Their money doesn't follow them into the Police and Fire Pension.

The affect on our Correctional Pension will be massive. All of the 911 Dispatchers 55 or older can begin drawing on a pension they never paid into almost immediately. I hear as many as 10% of the 911 Dispatchers would be eligible! A pension predicated on the dangers of inmate contact, of which they have none. The result could lead to higher employee contributions and lower COLA's on those who paid in most of their careers.

This is not a slam on our hard working 911 Telecommunicators, but an attempt to avoid destroying our healthy pension.

Contact your State Senators and Representatives!

Dave Metusalem , Conflict of Interest on PERA Board

Dave Metuslam

I just read the June 29, Newsletter for members of PERA today. As a Corrections Retiree Reporter I feel duty bound to point out a conflict of interest.

This caught My eye,  from Thomas Stanley,President of the PERA Board of Trustees: " I also want to welcome David Metusalem back to the board as the Retired, Disabled, and Survivor representative. Dave has prior experience on the PERA board as an elected Police and Fire representative and also served as vice president."

Let me state up front, this appointment is rife with conflict of interest. Dave rose through the ranks at the Ramsey County Sheriff's Office. He eventually was the Under Sheriff at Ramsey County, July of 1995 to March 2017. During that time he sat on the PERA Board representing Police and Fire.

He had to step down from the PERA board when he retired as a Peace Officer and became the Executive Director of the MPPOA, May 2017 until December 2018 when he left the MPPOA. All is well and good up until then.

Well now he is the appointed Chief Deputy of the Ramsey County Sheriff's Office and the PERA Board Retired, Disabled and Survivor representative and therein lies the conflict.

As Chief Deputy he has the power to hire and fire, but more importantly, as Chief Deputy he has say over which Detention Deputies and Deputies can qualify for Disability under PERA. So the conflict is, will he be looking out for the interest of the Ramsey County Sheriff's Office or the PERA member seeking a PERA disability pension?

This is perfectly legal. He is a retiree, and as an appointed Chief Deputy he can legally hold this position. But this loop hole in the law allows a conflict! Imagine you're an injured Ramsey County Detention Deputy or Licensed Deputy and your boss has a vote on the PERA Board whether or not you qualify for a Disability Pension?

The election to fill the Retired, Disabled, and Survivor representative won't open up for more then a year. But at that time I will put my name in to represent us on the PERA Board as the Retired, Disabled, and Survivor representative.

I look forward to your support and will continue to look out for our Pension.

Beware LELS, Law Enforcement Labor Services!

Hey Minnesota CO's, all representation is not the same.

LELS has a pitch to Corrections Officers on their website.

That's funny because LELS (Sean Gormley and David Metusalem) , Teamsters Local 320 (Brian Aldes) and AFSCME all signed off on allowing PERA CO's to take a Pension cut just a few months ago. Thank God MNPEA and I caught it.

They are also pitching their Legal Plan. I'm not sure how it's working now, but back when Hennepin County Detention was with them it didn't apply to Detention Deputies, only sworn officers. I'm also sure it doesn't apply to off duty like MNPEA's plan does. Hell, they didn't even support the PERA Correctional Officers Pension when we were working on it. Dan Wells sat behind me at a meeting and laughed!

We are in a time when CO's are leaving the likes of Teamsters Local 320 and AFSCME, just be careful you go to a Union that will represent Corrections. Not just take your dues for Police only.

Pension Bill Passes

The new PERA Pension Bill has passed. HF3053 and SF2620

Public Employee Pensions have been a hot topic and the original proposals were to cut our annual Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) down to a maximum of 1.5% with a minimum of 1%.

The PERA Corrections Pension under the new bill will be between 1% and a maximum 2.5% (COLA) based on the Federal cost of living index.

We have been at 2.5% and based on the economy should remain there for the foreseeable future.

See previous postings for all the grit.

Special thanks to Doug Anderson of PERA and the PERA Board for listening to Tom Perkins of MNPEA and myself and recommending to the legislature we cap out at our current 2.5% COLA. Also to my Representative Abigail Whelan for meeting with me and bringing our concerns to the Bill's authors to allow us to remain at the higher COLA.

To all CO's and retiree's out there remember, Teamsters Local 320, AFSCME Council 5 and LELS
had all agreed to cut our PERA Correctional COLA to 1.5%! They called it shared sacrifice.

Thank you legislature and PERA for hearing OUR voices.

PERA Correctional Pension Update

Good news on our Pension front. 

According to  PERA: Strong year for PERA investments.
The investment performance for PERA's three largest retirement plans--the General Employees, Police & Fire, and Correctional Plans--for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2017, was excellent. The Combined Fund posted a 15.1 percent rate of return for the 12-month period.

and from the PERA Newsletter 

CORRECTIONAL PLAN

The Correctional Plan legislative proposal includes a post-retirement increase to provide 100 percent of the Consumer Price Index (CPI), with a 1 percent floor, and a 2.5 percent cap until the Plan’s funding ratio drops below 80 percent for one year or 85 percent for two consecutive years. The funding ratio would be measured on the market value basis every year. If the funding ratio does not meet the required level, the post-retirement increase would be 100 percent of CPI, with a 1 percent floor, and a 1.5 percent cap. Once the lower cap applies, no further triggers would exist.

The proposal preserves the opportunity for a post-retirement increase as high as 2.5 percent provided that the funded ratio exceeds the existing trigger.

New Pension Bill

A new Bill has been introduced in the Minnesota  House and Senate affecting our PERA Correctional Pension (HF3053 and SF2620).

Originally the recomendation was to lump our PERA Correctional Plan in with all of the rest and give us only an annual cost of living adjustment (COLA) floor of 1% with a ceiling of 1.5% based on inflation. AFSCME called it "shared sacrifice." Teamsters and even LELS signed off on it. Willing to weaken the PERA Correctional Plan!

After Tom Perkins of MNPEA and myself met with PERA Executive Director Doug Anderson and the PERA Board, they recommended to the legislature that our PERA Correctional Plan have a floor of 1% with a ceiling of 2.5% based on inflation.

While I would prefer no change to our annual COLA of 2.5%, if change is going to come, at least we will maintain a COLA of 2.5% in times of inflation.

The new bills reflect that. Thank you Doug Anderson, PERA Board and legislatures.
Special thanks to Rep. Abigail Whelan for meeting with me early on and contacting the Bill's authors.

Liars, Representation and Pensions

On 2/16/18, Teamsters Local 320 Secretary Treasurer Brian Aldes had an editorial published in the Star Tribune.

I can't believe he had the audacity to discuss public employee pensions, "...pensions are promises employers make to their employees in the form of deferred compensation. Public employees pay into their pensions through contributions to the plan.."

Teamsters Local 320 actually had agreed to allow a cut in the Cost of Living for their CO's pension from 2.5% to 1.5% a year. They along with AFSCME, and LELS were unwilling to stand up for their CO's!  MNPEA was the only union to do so.

Brian's and the Teamsters main concern seems to be collecting dues rather than member representation. Had that been their goal the Hennepin County Detention Deputies and Dispatchers (911) wouldn't have decertified them in 2011, followed not much later by Minneapolis 911 who all went to MNPEA.

The crux of his editorial is the fear that Janus vs. AFSCME, Council 31 will be upheld by the Supreme Court. Why? Because then people won't have to pay dues if the Union isn't doing what they are being paid to do!

I am very pro-union, but if a union has forgotten they exist for the members, they serve no purpose.

PERA Board of Trustees approves legislative proposal for Correctional Plan

After meetings with myself and MNPEA Vice President Tom Perkins I am proud to share:

PERA Board of Trustees approves legislative proposal for Correctional Plan

The PERA Board of Trustees unanimously approved a legislative proposal for the Correctional Plan during their Jan. 9 special meeting. In December the Board approved legislative proposals for the General and Police & Fire Plans. The Board wanted PERA staff to receive additional input from stakeholder groups before voting on a legislative proposal for the Correctional Plan.

The modified Correctional Plan legislative proposal includes a post-retirement increase to provide 100 percent of the Consumer Price Index (CPI), with a 1 percent floor, and a 2.5 percent cap until the Plan’s funding ratio drops below 80 percent for one year or 85 percent for two consecutive years. The funding ratio would be measured on the market value basis every year. If the funding ratio does not meet the required level, the post-retirement increase would be 100 percent of CPI, with a 1 percent floor, and a 1.5 percent cap. Once the lower cap applies, no further triggers would exist.

The proposal preserves the opportunity for a post-retirement increase as high as 2.5 percent provided that the funded ratio exceeds the existing trigger which calls for that the funding ratio does not drop below the 80 percent for one year or 85 percent for two consecutive years.

Thank you PERA Executive Director Doug Anderson and PERA Board! Thank you Minnesota Public Employees Association (MNPEA) for standing with us!

No thanks to Teamsters Local 320, AFSCME Council 5 or LELS who were willing to let their Corrections Officer's cap out at 1.5%!

NEW PERA RECOMENDATION

After meeting with PERA Executive Director Doug Anderson he has emailed me a second PERA proposal.

This still has to go to the PERA Board but I believe Mr. Anderson heard what was said and has come up with a very reasonable responsible second proposal.

Here it is:

Proposal 1: Change to 100% of CPI, 1% floor, 1.5% cap. 

Proposal 2: 
*Change current COLA to 100% of CPI, 1% floor, 2.5% cap (currently a fixed 2.5%).

* Maintain the current “trigger off”, which is that the 2.5% cap turns off when funding is < 80% once or < 85% for two consecutive years. 

*If/when the “trigger off” occurs, the benefit goes to 100% CPI, 1% floor, 1.5% cap. 

*Eliminate any future “trigger on”. If the plan triggers off, it could never trigger back on. The benefit would remain 100% CPI, 1% floor, 1.5% cap.

In other words if CPI (inflation) is at least 2.5% or more we are guaranteed the 2.5% COLA. Depending on inflation we are guaranteed at least 1% but can go higher than the earlier proposed 1.5%.

I wish it were left alone, but the writing is on the wall for the legislature to eliminate triggers. The O'Driscoll/Rosen Bill wants to cap us at 1.5%,. The PERA proposal 2 would allow us to go up to our current 2.5% recognizing the health of our plan.

If we drop below the trigger we will join ranks with the other plans. I am a fiscal conservative and believe that is fair. If our plan is doing well we reap the benefit, if it gets weak we tighten the COLA belt. At the end of the day we want a healthy pension.

I again express my gratitude to PERA Executive Director Doug Anderson for taking time to listen to MNPEA Vice President Tom Perkins and myself.

This is not a MNPEA response, the MNPEA Board will meet and respond on their own.

As an interesting aside. We also learned at that meeting that LELS also met with PERA and was on-board with cutting the COLA to 1.5% of their CO's!

Remember, the legislature makes the laws that govern our pensions. PERA executes those laws. There is no guarantee the legislature will follow their recommendation. But if it comes to a fight at the Capital it's another arrow in the quiver.

To be clear, I prefer no change to our current Pension, as it is doing well. IF, they are are going to eliminate the triggers, I prefer the second proposal of the 2.5% COLA to the 1.5% cap.

PERA meeting and recommendation

Today MNPEA Vice President Tom Perkins and I met with PERA Executive Director Doug Anderson and Shayna (?).

They very graciously gave us an hour and a half. We all have the same goal of keeping our pension healthy. They have tremendous pressure to move the plans to 100% funding, a goal I agree with.

There is a proposal to lower the actuarial tables from 8% to 7.5%. If passed, this changes the amount considered fully funded. Under current law it's 8% and our payouts are based on that.

If the actuarial is lowered to 7.5% the proposal is to eliminate the triggers (read previous posts) and go to an across the board COLA formula. An annual COLA of 1% (as a floor) with a max COLA of 1.5% based on inflation (CPI).

In effect this cuts the PERA Correctional COLA a full 1% and the other, not as well funded plans only .5% and  *maintains 1% with no cut to the Police and Fire COLA even though they require $9,000,000 a year just to keep current funding.

This all leads to an assumed funding for the PERA General Plan and Police and Fire to be at 110% in 2047.

Ok, but the PERA Correctional Plan would be funded at 120% in 2047. With "shared sacrifice" we sacrifice more. It reminds me of the book Animal Farm. "All animals are created equal. But some are more equal than others."

PERA does not make law, but are frequently asked for recommendations. These recommendations mirror the O'Driscoll and Rosen Bill.

They gave us this meeting because as stakeholders, MNPEA and retirees of MNPEA, had no input into what they will propose. Now we have, again thank you Doug Anderson.

The hope is when they meet in January they will recommend, like last year, no change to the PERA Correctional Plan.

*Post corrected 12/22/17 I originally posted P&F would get a .5% COLA.

Meeting with my State Rep about our Pension

Just finished a very productive meeting with my State Representative Abigail Whelan. She met me at our local Dunn Brothers Coffee and we had a very productive conversation about the recent bills (HF 565, SF 545) that sought to lower our COLA. She was in agreement with our position and will be talking to Rep.O'Driscoll (one of the authors) about it.

As you know Governor Dayton vetoed them, but they were part of the Omnibus Bill and very likely will be re-introduced.

I cannot stress enough, please contact your State Representatives and Senators. Rep. Whelan also recommends this.

Stress that our PERA Correctional Pension is well funded.

There is no need for 'shared sacrifice' with less well run pensions.

There is already a trigger in our pension that if it drops below 80% funding our COLA automatically cuts to 1%. (We are funded at 95.7%).

PERA did not recommend any adjustments to our pension, only the Authors of the Bill (HF 565, SF 545) did.

I will be meeting soon with my State Senator Jim Abler.

I cannot thank Rep. Whelan enough for meeting me to hear our issue.

Some Details

As with most of you, I am a fiscal conservative. I have watched pension plans crash and burn. Like the Teamsters Central States pension.

To Minnesota's Credit, the PERA Board and legislature have historically done a great job of keeping our pensions solvent.

The last eight years were not particularly good for many pensions. The MSRS Correctional Plan, PERA Police and Fire, TRA (Teachers Union) and Judges pensions are not doing so well
and wisely some adjustments are being made to insure they remain solvent into the future.

Among proposals by Sen. Rosen in SF545 is to reduce the Cost Of Living Adjustment (COLA) of some of the plans, but not equally. Among them is to cut MSRA Correctional from a 2% annual COLA to 1.5% and to cut our PERA Correctional COLA from 2.5% to 1.5% so they are uniform.

Wait a minute. MSRA Correctional is way under funded and only gets a .5% reduction in it's COLA. The PERA Correctional Plan which is funded at 95.7% is asked to take a 1% cut in COLA!

The Legislative Commission's own actuarials on the PERA Correctional Plan state, "The funded status of the plan will increase gradually towards a 100% funded ratio."

It's disturbing to see Republicans like Sen. Rosen and her counterpart in the House, Rep. O'Driscoll, wanting to make things uniform. That sounds more like socialism than conservatism. Sadly, the vote was 100% in the Senate for this.

I can understand the cut to the MSRA Correctional Plan, but not the PERA Corrections Plan. They are two separate pensions, separate funding and one plan is anemic, the other healthy. Why give the healthy plan the bigger cut? This is unfair to County Corrections Officers.

Here's a large part of the problem. The largest Unions representing County Corrections Officers are MNPEA and LELS. We had no input!

The two groups that had input were Teamsters Local 320 (who lost almost all of their CO's) and AFSCME.  They were more interested is shoring up the pensions of their General Groups and Police, which make up a majority of their members.

AFSCME actually threw their approximately 100 CO's at the Hennepin County Workhouse under the bus. On their AFSME Council 5 website they call for shared sacrifice! Cutting our COLA does not help MSRS! If I were a Hennepin County Workhouse CO I'd scream bloody murder at AFSCME.

I leave you with a picture from AFSCME Council 5, calling for shared sacrifice! They plan on working against County CO's again in 2018. We have much work ahead.

Pension Watch Pt 3, what we are up against.

Watch the video, in it Sen. Rosen, Chairman of the Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement speaks of her bill.

Of note is the stated goal at the 3 minute, 30 second mark of "stabilizing the pensions at 90%."

Watch the video and then look at my comment son You Tube.

Pension Watch Part 2

So after much digging around here’s what I found out.

The PERA Board made no recommendations to change our pension.
It is 100% politically driven by the legislature.

The Bill (HF565) was introduced into the House by Rep. Tim O’Driscoll (R-Dist 13) and in the Senate (SF545) by Sen. Julie A. Rosen (R-Dist 23).

It died last time because Gov. Dayton vetoed it. But my understanding is it’s coming back.

Our PERA Correctional Plan already pays out the lowest benefit of any corrections or law enforcement pension in the state.

The Police and Fire pension pays out at a rate of 3% of their high 5 with a 1% annual COLA. They are only funded at 87.7%. (and they have a seat on the PERA board).

The State Corrections pension pays 2.4% a of their high 5 with a 2% COLA. (and they have a seat on their MSRS pension board).

Our PERA Correctional Plan pays out at 1.9% of our high 5 with a 2.5%  annual COLA because we are funded at 95.7%.

This Bill is patently unfair to PERA CO’s and Detention Deputies. We have the healthiest pension and the lowest payout! If they want to limit our COLA then make it fair and at least give us the 2.4% payout the State Corrections Officers get!

Rep. Tim O'Driscoll

The good news is that nothing can really be done on this until this summer. Our COLA is safe for 2018 and probably 2019 by the time they get anything done.

If we can get the authors of the Bill to withdraw the Bill or at least the part affecting us, we’ll be fine.

If not our pension will not keep up with the cost of living.

Contact Rep. Tim O'Driscoll  rep.tim.odriscoll@house.mn and ask him to withdraw our portion from his Bill.
Home: Sartell P.O. Box 225, 56377

Sen. Julie A. Rosen

Contact Sen. Julie A. Rosen sen.julie.rosen@senate.mn

Home: Vernon Center P.O. Box 428 56090

Ask her to withdraw out potion from her Bill.

When you contact them stress the unfairness.
Our pension is fully funded with the lowest payout.
Ask why they are punishing us! 

People who spend their lives in a dangerous career for public safety shouldn't get shortchanged at the end!



Feel free to contact me at my new email: pera.watchdog@gmail.com

PERA Correctional Pension Watch

As a retiree I am paying close attention to our Correctional Pension. There are some proposed changes afoot that concern me. They should also concern future retirees.

Of particular concern is this Correctional Plan item from the PERA website:

Anderson said that PERA staff will continue to meet with Correctional Plan stakeholders to gather input into possible plan changes. The Board did not propose changes during the 2017 legislative session; however, the Legislature did propose a change from the current 2.5 percent trigger to a fixed 1.5 percent COLA. 

In the same letter the legislature is proposing a change from a 1% COLA for Police and Fire to 1.5%.

Currently the *Correctional Plan is funded at 95.7% and the Police & Fire Plan at 87.7%. The trigger for a 2.5% COLA is 90%.

*Source PERA Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.Pg 12.

The exceptional health of the Correctional Plan triggers the higher 2.5% COLA for Correctional retirees.

The Police and Fire Plan has had issues and has been unable to hit the 90% -2.5% COLA trigger.

Our Correctional Plan pays out at a rate of 1.9% of our contributions. Police and Fire pays out 3%!

Our plan has more money and triggers the 2.5% COLA. Theirs currently does not.

I don't care what they give P&F, but the proposed downplaying of our benefit seems to be a give away from the money WE paid into ours for another plan.

There is a PERA meeting on December 14th supposedly seeking input I want to attend. I just emailed PERA to get the info.

Why is this important? Former Teamsters Business Agent David Metusalem has Retired from the Ramsey County Sheriff's Office to be Executive Director of Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association, aka MPPOA (Congratulations). This required him to relinquish his seat on the Police and Fire Plan Board, triggering an election. We've never had a seat at the table!

The PERA website says they are meeting with "Correctional Plan Stakeholders." Who?

Why does this matter? P&F have members watching their retirement. Corrections does not!

Back in 2009 when we at Hennepin County were Teamsters, we made a proposal to get a Detention Deputy on the PERA Board. It passed, but never happened.

Who is looking out for us? Back in 1997 when we were first meeting at the Teamsters building with Mike Golen and Tom Perkins (our plans' architect) , Dan Wells from LELS sat behind me laughing at the idea. MPPOA and LELS won't care. Teamsters failed to act!

We have to get a Detention Deputy/CO and or Retiree on the Board. MNPEA members your board is already on this. The Correctional Plan architect is on MNPEA's board.

MPPOA and LELS, are you going to protect your 800 CO's?

Watch this blog for updates. Be prepared to contact your State Reps.